R4481 Checkstyle Parameter Rename Issue

[Cantor, Scott]

This should be fixed now, I renamed the fields and will do that exclusively in the future.

It does bear noting that this is an implementation class, and so even being forced to declare that class in a bean raises some problems. So there may be a deeper issue we need to tackle that's kind of a corrolary to Rod's point about the resolver.

This is the thing that became difficult to reconcile between abandoning the custom XML but still using Spring. It's much harder to maintain the necessary separation, and it's mostly done by pre-declaring parent beans or creating factory beans that are in the API.

-- Scott