Thoughts on client storage testing

[Tom Zeller]

> On Sep 25, 2015, at 2:55 PM, Brent Putman <putmanb at georgetown.edu> wrote:
> 
>> I’m going with Object[ServerConfig][BrowserConfig].
>> 
>> For future reasons, I’m wondering if ServerConfig and BrowserConfig should extend BaseContext.
>> 
> 
> I don't know what all you are, or will be, doing with this, but that sounds pretty involved to me.  Unless you have this scattered all over lots of classes, you can always just change it later. It is tests, after all.

Well that’s the thing. They’re aren’t that many tests, but they all basically need to agree on the number and type of method parameters, it seems, when using the same DataProvider to provide the ... parameters/data to each test method. Code find/replace is not a big deal, I guess my thinking is that coding to Object[][] is a fairly _general_ API ;-)