3.2 schedule / freeze

[Tom Zeller]

> On Oct 29, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> 
> I'm probably 80% done getting single logout for SAML plugged in, which means it's silly not to include it even if we have to delay. The testing for that will definitely push into next week though, so if freeze really means freeze and not "feature freeze", I'd need a week more.

Feature freeze is fine with me, that's also what I recall from the dev call, but I was being purposively vague then too.

I see no reason for me to block/obstruct SLO work :-)