Unlock opensaml-parent ?

[Ian Young]

> On 23 Oct 2015, at 17:30, Tom Zeller <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 6:11 AM, Ian Young <ian at iay.org.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> I don't see that buying us anything in general. What do you see as the benefit of such a requirement?
> 
> Consistency ? Weakly stated, though.

Consistency in the parent POM across components is not in itself a benefit, so you're just restating the outcome. I'm asking what concrete benefit you think results from the particular kind of consistency you're proposing.

> Okay, I’m remembering what we said on the call better now. And how do we define “functional” changes ? Quickly and offhand, I would say : ultimately it boils down to the versions of the artifacts we ship in WEB-INF/lib.

Is the concern that you don't think we'll ship the most recent dependency artifacts unless we rebuild the whole stack? Have you done the obvious experiment?

    -- Ian




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3563 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20151023/c366f49c/attachment.p7s>