Unmarshalling saml metadata extensions

[Cantor, Scott]

On 5/21/15, 12:36 PM, "Brent Putman" <putmanb at georgetown.edu> wrote:

>You lost me, I didn't see anything in there re: Conditions.  Are you steps ahead and assuming that these things would have to be represented in a protocol message or Assertion as Condition(s), and then extrapolating?

Yes, I was assuming that.

>If so, that makes sense, but I think that's
> throwing the OP off because I don't think that's literally why his unmarshalling is failing.

Not literally, no.

>I'm not seeing why what he posted is schema-invalid.  It may or may not make sense from a design-a-SAML-metadata-extension perspective.

I didn't see metadata at all, so I possibly got blinded by all the wso2 stuff.

I saw "Audience" and thought "Audience conditions".

-- Scott