OpenSAML how-to: adding transport to context

[Misagh Moayyed]

Next question: where/how are the signature canonicalization algorithms
set? 

-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 8:52 AM
To: Shib Dev
Subject: Re: OpenSAML how-to: adding transport to context

On 5/20/15, 3:39 PM, "Misagh Moayyed" <mmoayyed at unicon.net> wrote:


>
>Should there be some sort of else/throw clause that would indicate an 
>error, in case a signable object is received and with no parameters to 
>sign it?

No, the signal to sign or not is the presence of the parameters. Same for
ecnryption.

-- Scott

>
--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net