A maven approach to deploying the Idp
Walter Forbes Hoehn (wassa)
wassa at memphis.edu
Mon May 4 17:59:36 EDT 2015
Agreed. Many, many moons ago this was the way the IdP worked. It didn’t take us long to realize this wasn’t a path forward. It’s awkward to administer and imposes system downtime when none should be needed.
-Walter
> On May 4, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
>
> On 5/4/15, 4:52 PM, "Misagh Moayyed" <mmoayyed at unicon.net> wrote:
>
> "Redeployments are required for changes, because the IdP runtime is modified to not point to an external location outside the webapp, as it did previously with references to /opt/shibboleth-idp for instance by default, but inside its own context. Therefore, any changes that are applied to a local overlay
> need to redeployed and repackaged to be included in the same webapp."
>
> That's a non-starter for any deployment that isn't just a toy.
More information about the dev
mailing list