Versioning (again).

[Cantor, Scott]

On 5/1/15, 5:21 AM, "Ian Young" <ian at iay.org.uk> wrote:
>
>So the question is whether protected methods in classes in -api packages are part of "all public interactions points by which a developer might interact with the system" as the version policy puts it.
>
>I had a poke around and can't see anything that explicitly answers this question either way. So I guess we must think it's obvious, in which case the answer is probably "yes". Such is the penalty for an API which includes non-final classes, I guess.

I certainly would think of them as part of the API.

To be honest, I sort of looked at the original request more along the lines of adding the SAMLMetadataContext to the Velocity context alongside some of the rest, rather than modifying the other context class.

-- Scott