[ot] Quartz ?

[Marvin Addison]

>
> There's also the
> newer native Java executor service pool type of approach.  Quartz might
> be overkill for this honestly


+1

I like Quartz -- it's great. But I've also dug under the hood enough to get
a sense that it's big and complicated (RMI, property-based config, durable
job/trigger storage). I would recommend using only if you have a clear use
case.

M <dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20150312/e523d8d5/attachment.html