activationConditionRef problem

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/10/15, 7:04 AM, "dev on behalf of Rod Widdowson" <dev-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:

>> Since we have time to work on this, let's file a bug and we'll consider
>the best
>> choice.
>
>IDP-768.  As I note there the problem was really caused by using c:_0 rather
>than c:candidates, so there may in fact be nothing to do (except make sure
>that we eschew the c:_n syntax except where we need it.

Yeah, as I noted on users, my results using c:name have been very inconsistent. Sometimes it works, and other times all the typing craziness gets in the way and just doesn't seem to work. As an example, see if you can get a simple String bean built with a constructor set by name. I don't think I managed it.

-- Scott