IDP-616
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Thu Feb 26 17:55:56 EST 2015
The more I dig into this, the more I think this just really shouldn't be
the job of the consent flows to deal with. I'm sure we could beat it into
submission, but I think it's better if this is addressed somehow in the
storage layer even if it ends up being a layer violation. Sometimes that's
just the cost of hiding stuff from the application layer.
We have the freedom to add some APIs for this release, so I'd much rather
fix it once and potentially address other use cases than try and do this
for one use case.
We still may need a counter for frequency, etc., but that's really its own
problem.
If I have until Monday at least, I can give it a try.
-- Scott
More information about the dev
mailing list