Custom metadata provider

[Brent Putman]

On 12/9/15 12:12 PM, Rod Widdowson wrote:
>> That would work if the goal is to feed an octet stream, but I would expect
> a
>> database approach is possibly more about avoiding the XML entirely.
> Good point.  In that case one might want the thing to implement
> BatchMetadataResolver (and hence extend AbstractReloadingMetadataResolver)
> but rather DynamicMetadataResolver (and hence extend
> AbstractDynamicMetadataResolver).
>
> Now that would be very nice.  Minimal in memory footprint...


Yes, making it be a dynamic resolver instead of batch would work out
nicely.  I think that could work probably work with either the XML or
normalized schema approach. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20151209/6e491e4a/attachment-0001.html>