Subflow input mappings are lost in transitions
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Mon Aug 24 11:50:42 EDT 2015
On 8/24/15, 11:37 AM, "dev on behalf of Misagh Moayyed" <dev-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of mmoayyed at unicon.net> wrote:
>As such, I have no way to pass input parameters from one flow to another
>with SWF mechanics, other than making way with PRC itself.
Which is our intended approach.
>Makes sense? Shouldn't all other mappings be considered in that 2nd
>invocation?
We don't use the SWF input/output mechanism, really, anywhere. I don't really understand the issue you're seeing, since any propagation of parameters would require the cooperation of both the calling flow and the called flow (and the latter would be impossible to handle arbitrarily, it would have to know what it was being passed). But we use the context tree to communicate between flows.
-- Scott
More information about the dev
mailing list