MappedAttributeInMetadata Filter

[Cantor, Scott]

On 4/7/15, 10:11 AM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:

>> >Now I come to document it, this seems to pretty much overlap with the
>> >AttributeInMetadata Filter, only without the latter's configurability.
>Do
>> >we want to document this or deprecate it?
>> 
>> What configurability are you thinking of?
>
>I suppose it's less of a configurability and more of a "making up for the
>shortcomings".  The attributeName and attributeNameFormat thing.

That's a result of us not having yet built any way to inject different mapping rules from SAML back to IdP attributes other than the ones derived from the resolver.

I'll file an issue to track the need for an explicit AttributeExtractor a la the SP (which at one point I assumed would get built if we did actually build an SP in Java).

-- Scott