Distributed attribute-resolver.

[Cantor, Scott]

On 9/25/14, 6:25 AM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:

>The currently shipped attribute-resolver.xml is pretty minimal, do we want
>to include the full glory that is shipped with V2?

Maybe we could ship a default that's more minimal and have a second file
as a more complete example? I just don't, personally, love all that
clutter.

>If we do bring this forward we need to consider what to do about
>$IDP_SCOPE$.  I'd favour making it a property (%{idp.scope}) defaulted to
>example.org.

Yeah, I think so.

>Then of course I need to push that configuration into the installer.  Is
>it
>reasonable to just default it to the DNS name, or do we need to prompt the
>used? It rather feels as though this needs to be prompted for.

I think you could get away with the second level DNS name.

-- Scott