v3 consent to attribute release : half-thoughts on UIs

[Cantor, Scott]

On 9/18/14, 11:27 AM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:
>
>So that basically answers my question, which I didn't really ask,
>which was : should we abstract the consent storage record ? And the
>answer is, no, that is specific to the flow.

Yeah, modulo perhaps a minimal base class, which I think is what I did in
the case of the SPSession. Like maybe the basic metadata (when, what flow
or some kind of type tag, expiration) would be defined commonly, but
that's it.

>But maybe per-attribute-consent is a separate flow, rather than a
>configuration toggle.

I think it is, personally. Initially at least. I kind of think there will
be multiple such flows for a while.

-- Scott