A couple of TODOs in the attributes code.

[Nate Klingenstein]

Rod,

For the peanut gallery, can you explain why "no" would be the preferable or best answer to whether that function is needed for RDB's but not LDAP?  I'm not disagreeing, just looking to make as many pieces of the implementation feel the same to deployers as possible.

Thanks,
Nate.

On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:40 AM, Rod Widdowson <rdw at steadingsoftware.com<mailto:rdw at steadingsoftware.com>> wrote:

The first is about attribute value mapping in LDAP.  I think this ties back
into the RDBMS mapping that Scot and I are looking at.  However it refers to
new function "Do we want to do data mapping as we do for RDBMS?", and I
think right now we can say "no".

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20141021/609e0ba3/attachment.html