Dynamic metadata resolver; HttpClient usage
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Tue Nov 18 21:31:26 EST 2014
On 11/19/14, 12:52 AM, "Brent Putman" <putmanb at georgetown.edu> wrote:
>
>The dynamic metadata resolver and associated IdP Spring schema and config
>is essentially done. It might be a good idea if someone other than me
>gives the IdP config schema a look over (shibboleth-metadata.xsd) and the
>parsers, just to have another opinion
> what it should look like, etc. Or in case I've totally missed something
>that is expected to be there.
I'll try and take a look tomorrow.
>Somewhat related: HttpClient usage. I didn't see (point me if I'm
>missing) that we are by default wiring in any particular HttpClient
>instance into components, and in particular I'm wondering about use of
>caching HttpClients. Should we either wire one of those in and/or make
>the parsers, etc build a caching variant by default? Basically: should
>HttpClient caching be opt-in, or opt-out?
Opt-out I would think.
>Having it be on by default might be nice for deployers, but would mean
>that we'd have to decide upon the caching strategy/store (essentially
>in-memory vs filesystem), so I don't know how contentious that choice
>would be...
Is it storing the data or just the caching tags?
-- Scott
More information about the dev
mailing list