Consent / upgrades

[David Langenberg]

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> On 11/17/14, 7:01 PM, "David Langenberg" <davel at uchicago.edu> wrote:
>
> >IMO, after upgrading, I'd like it to work just as it does now.  If I need
> >new features (like consent) then I don't see it as being a problem to
> >require me to update my config to the new formats.
>
> I think that's all true, but it has implications on the actual impact of
> prividing consent. As in, it will get very little use aside from new
> installs, so that dilutes the impact.
>

That's true, but at the same time, turning on consent (at least here) will
take an act of a committee and involve a bunch of sign-offs for usability,
testing, etc.  Upgrading to IdPv3 without turning on consent just requires
sending a FYI to my announce list & a 5 minute change-advisory call.

Dave


-- 
David Langenberg
Identity & Access Management
The University of Chicago
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20141117/b1b106a0/attachment.html