property-placeholder.xml

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/17/14, 12:37 PM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:

>All the services definitions still include this file. 
>
>It is obviously not doing any harm being there, but do we actually need 
>it?
>I know that under certain circumstances idp.properties is always being
>loaded, but the services load inside a different SpringApplicationContext.
>An empirical test seems to indicate that we can do without them.

My impression had been that when you cross a context boundary, the 
property-placeholder isn't inherited. I thought that was why we had them 
there (and why we had the relevant Spring in the webflow bean files).

-- Scott