> Should we be aiming for compatibility between V2 and V3 as far as default > endpoint locations? > > I can see arguments for both. I have assumed "yes" to compatibility, but what would be the argument for the contrary, not preserving compatibility ? Something like "SAML1/Unsolicited/SSO" instead of "Shibboleth/SSO" to match "SAML2/Unsolicited/SSO" ?