Actions should not be Identifiable ?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 3/22/14, 6:13 AM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>I would go further.  It is not #setId() which is important here, it's
>#getId().  AFAICS the only need for the first is the second and if the
>second isn't needed we should ditch it.  That would simplify a lot of
>stuff,
>especially the tests.

Right.

>I had a thought last night which re-raises a suggestion that Tom made 9
>months past which we might want to factor in to the discussions.  If a
>major
>use of #getId() is in logging (and as far as I can see it is always a
>superset of the needs of a particular class), should we consider putting
>#getLogPrefix() (plus supporting infrastructure) in there too?

Probably, at least as a protected method in the abstract base.

-- Scott