Straw-man for security parameter placement
ramu kalla
kallaramu49 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 15 09:14:07 EDT 2014
Dear Sir,
I am new to SAML.I am Using SAML SSO implementation in my
application using java.Can you provide sample application to implement SAML
SSO.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramu Kalla
On 13 March 2014 08:52, Brent Putman <putmanb at georgetown.edu> wrote:
>
> On 3/12/14 9:55 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> > On 3/12/14, 9:52 PM, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> >> I think now that I see the different cases, I'm inclined to separate the
> >> parameter types up after all, and I'm wondering if maybe the *Parameter
> >> beans should just be context types so that they can be directly attached
> >> into the tree instead of having to wrap them. Does that seem crazy? You
> >> had said they're "just beans" and that's consistent with most of the
> >> context types.
> > Actually that seems like a bad coupling now that I think about it,
>
> Me too. :-)
>
> > and not
> > necessary. I can just create an EncryptionContext to wrap the
> > EncryptionParameters and add flags for what to encrypt, and that's
> > probably a better separation of concerns.
>
> That actually seems like the best solution all-around for SAML
> encryption, since it's all in the profile actions.
>
> >
> > My concern is just that I'd rather not have to re-eval the condition
> flags
> > in case they are expensive in some way, and just be able to track the
> > result at the time I check them initially.
>
> Yes, I agree.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140315/3980503e/attachment.html
More information about the dev
mailing list