XXXXFilesystem types in the secuirty schema.

Cantor, Scott cantor.2 at osu.edu
Thu Jul 3 13:12:55 EDT 2014


On 7/3/14, 7:13 AM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:

>The security schema identifies two things which can be given file names
>
>PKIXFilesystem (validation info types)
>X509Filesystem (credential types)
>
>Thanks to the work Tom did with the kitting it would be trivial and
>backwards compatible to change these to accept generic resources.  My
>question is whether it is worth the effort - particularly since they both
>have Inline homologues which would answer the use case for having not
>filesystem resources in a configuration.

If it's trivial to do Resource support, my inclination would be to create
new elements called PKIXResource, etc. and do it that way and just
deprecate these.

-- Scott



More information about the dev mailing list