XXXXFilesystem types in the secuirty schema.

[Ian Young]

On 3 Jul 2014, at 12:13, Rod Widdowson <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:

> Thanks to the work Tom did with the kitting it would be trivial and
> backwards compatible to change these to accept generic resources.  My
> question is whether it is worth the effort - particularly since they both
> have Inline homologues which would answer the use case for having not
> filesystem resources in a configuration.

I've been bitten by the "oh that has to be an *actual file*" thing so many times recently that my gut reaction is to use generic resources, particularly if it's trivial and backwards compatible to do so.

Very much a gut reaction though, I don't have a specific use case.

	-- Ian



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5943 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140703/2284cf49/attachment.bin