Provide do-nothing no-arg constructor or not ?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 2/11/14, 12:16 AM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:

>Should I remove the do-nothing no-arg constructor from OpenSAML's
>AbstractProfileAction now that I have removed the one and only call to
>setId(getClass().getName) ?
>
>On a dev call, I thought we talked about whether or not to let the
>compiler automatically provide a default constructor, but I do not
>remember what we decided.

I heard fairly strong agreement not to use them, and nobody strongly
advocating having them, so I've been removing them.

-- Scott