SignAssertions action not needed ?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 2/5/14, 10:42 PM, "Brent Putman" <putmanb at georgetown.edu> wrote:
>
>Ok.  I would at least for the time being change the code to use
>DecryptionParameters just to avoid confusion.

I'll add a TODO for now, and change the code to construct the Decrypter
piecemeal to avoid use of the constructors you don't want.

There's no existing DecryptionParameters for the action to use, so that's
why I didn't use it.

-- Scott