Anonymous vs. Unverified (was Re: CAS Protocol Milestone)

[Cantor, Scott]

On 8/20/14, 11:02 AM, "Ian Young" <ian at iay.org.uk> wrote:
>
>I think it probably is worth doing. The rule of thumb for these things I
>always tried to stick to was to assume that there will always be more new
>people coming along in the future than have ever used it in the past, so
>cleaning things up (with some kind of compatibility for existing users)
>is always beneficial in the (possibly very) long term.
>
>Documentation and the default configuration would be the places I'd
>assume we'd prioritise changes.

Alright. Anonymous profiles kind of sort of work again now, so after I
look into Brent's changes and a couple of other things I can get it
renamed. There are a number of APIs that need to change along with it.

Can you file an issue for this?

-- Scott