Can we ditch support for <SecretKey> in credentials?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 4/15/14, 12:10 PM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>I'm not an expert in this domain and so I just don't have the insight into
>the requirements.  So the question is whether I should duplicate the V3
>parsing (allowing us to bolt in SecretKey support at a later date without
>having to jiggle the parsers), or whether it suffices to issue a log.WARN
>if
>we discover such a declaration? Or both?

Not sure, I'd say that's Brent's call.

-- Scott