Co-bundling Jetty ?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 9/12/13 12:48 PM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:

>> The support burden of it not being a plug and
>> play package would be very large and be entirely about Jetty support,
>> which is not a burden I'm prepared to take on. It's hard to see how we
>> could avoid that support role if we're shipping the container ourselves.
>
>Ah. Supporting Jetty would be avoided by no longer declaring it as a
>dependency, correct ?

Supporting it formally, yes. At least in my view and in the manner in
which I go about answering questions.

Informally, we will field many such questions, as we do now.

-- Scott