Co-bundling Jetty ?

[Leif Johansson]

On 09/11/2013 05:48 PM, Tom Zeller wrote:
> I am interested in feedback regarding co-bundling Jetty[1]. Do you
> like that idea ? alternatives ?
>
> The basic idea, as I see it, is to provide jetty-distribution as a
> versioned and unpacked dependency.
>
> I understand that there will be a range of deployment strategies,
> maybe custom is the most common. The target deployer for co-bundling
> Jetty might be those interested in a quick start or demo, or for SPs
> who need a test IdP.  For the latter, I have already done some work
> with v2.
>
> The idea of providing a v2 package with a co-bundled Jetty is
> interesting to me for the purposes of generating feedback, I like
> making decisions based on data. Maybe the upgrade path from v2 to v3
> would be made easier with an incremental step. Maybe not.
>
> It would be good to have a discussion on a Friday call, but I wanted
> to bring it up here first.
+1 and I think you should not think of this as a demo-test
deploy option either - I think a lot of sites will like the idea
of having 1 less dependency to manage.
>
> [1] https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/x/NYCN
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net