[IdP]<SAMLObjectName>

[Cantor, Scott]

On 10/21/13 10:56 AM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>But there is a risk of (a) over long method names which we all love so
>much
>and also of (b) Yack Shaving.

I'd just go with what looks best. I don't think every method name has to
be 100% consistent, but I would tend toward it.

In the AttributeName case you mentioned, I don't think it's unhelpful to
be clarifying that it's talking about wire names vs. internal names.

Actually if it's talking about the internal ones, that might be better
termed AttributeId anyway.

-- Scott