[rhetorical] Should AttributeResolver implement the Resolver interface ?
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Fri Nov 8 16:13:58 EST 2013
On 11/8/13, 4:09 PM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:
>
>interface ReloadableService<T extends ServiceableComponent>
> start()
> stop()
> reload()
> ...
> T getServiceableComponent()
>
>where I said "Resolver" but was thinking "ServiceableComponent", just
>not all the way yet, and that still is wrong.
Not hung up on details, but yes, I would expect something like that. But
that's definitely where I got lost in terms of seeing how we fit that
reloading/lifecycle stuff into the Spring model.
>Not that it would help much, but then we would not need
>AttributeResolverService and AttributeFilterService classes.
That seems desirable to me.
-- Scott
More information about the dev
mailing list