Attribute#getvalues()

[Rod Widdowson]

> That seems at odds with the XMLObject collection behavior, which AFAIK
> hasn't changed for V3.

Hmm.  I'm amenable to be persuaded either way and keeping everything
consistent across the project is pretty important.

I have a memory of a fair amount of code churn back a year ago when we tried
to work out the correct paradigm for Collections...

Brent, do you have any memories of discussions about this?   Absent anything
I'd be tempted to reverse my previous suggestion and change the javadoc
rather than any code.
 
> The other concern is that aren't a lot of V2 scripts using the
> getValues().add() approach?

We have to deal with this anyway, because the V2 scripts expect to be
allowed to add a java.lang.String, but the V3 Attributes expect to be given
an AttributeValue (I actually checked in the code to  handle that this
morning).

R