code review planning

[Cantor, Scott]

On 6/21/13 7:10 AM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>And they get even odder, what do you suppose:
>
>	<PolicyRequirementRule xsi:type="basic:AttributeValueString"
>value="jsmith" ignoreCase="true"/>
>
>Would be useful for?  It's a valid construction...

Hmm. It's schema valid, but I don't believe it's meant to be semantically
valid. If you use that rule as a policy matcher, you need to specify
attributeId. That's the intent anyway, and it's what the SP does, and I
thought the current IdP code did.

-- Scott