OpenSAML Velocity templates for POST etc. responses

[Michael A Grady]

On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Cantor, Scott wrote:

> On 2/20/13 10:45 AM, "Michael A Grady" <mgrady at unicon.net> wrote:
>> 
>> That would be ok (the filenames changing), as long as they retain
>> different names and the name has anything to do with the "action/event"
>> it is associated with (e.g. SAML2 POST, SAML1 POST, etc.). This "name"
>> isn't important enough to be worth creating yet another configuration
>> option for, it just provides one more way to potentially
>> differentiate/sort the results.
> 
> It wouldn't be a new option, it's an existing piece of data on the message
> encoder (the binding is there as a property).

And you would be ok with changes to:

 opensaml/saml2/binding/encoding/HTTPPostEncoder.java
 opensaml/saml2/binding/encoding/HTTPArtifactEncoder.java
 opensaml/saml1/binding/encoding/HTTPPostEncoder.java

to add the binding property ( getBindingURI() ) into the Velocity context? 


--
Michael A. Grady
Senior IAM Consultant, Unicon, Inc.