What is the "Other party" in Attribute Handling called?

[Cantor, Scott]

On Feb 23, 2013, at 1:27 PM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:

> And the AttributeRecipientContext would provide getId(), that is what
> you were thinking ?

Yes, or whatever standard method naming we want for these kinds of contexts.

> I like the multiple recipient context idea, something like
> getRecipients() on the AttributeRecipientContext, to make it efficient
> for the attribute resolver to resolve shared attributes. But that
> seems like further stepping away from v2, and I'm not sure how far we
> want to go in that direction.

I don't want to right now, and I figured just allowing for a more inefficient loop would be good enough for a use case we don't even have yet.

-- Scott