Opinions on SIDP-570?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 2/18/13 12:40 PM, "Christopher Bongaarts" <cab at umn.edu> wrote:
>
>We don't use anonymous relying parties here, but IMHO it should behave
>similarly to whatever it returns for a "registered" SP that has no UI
>info tags in its metadata.  Then maybe add a tag (if there's not one
>already) to easily allow for conditional display (e.g. a "has metadata"
>seal of approval) based on whether the current RP is anonymous or not.

Some of this may be "I can't figure out how in a very short span of time",
so I'm not committing to anything at this point, just wondering what
people think makes sense.

Just want to try and at least review any open requests since we don't
expect another 2.x feature release.

-- Scott