Spring 4 and Servlet 3.0

Brent Putman putmanb at georgetown.edu
Fri Dec 20 04:10:34 EST 2013


On 12/18/13 12:36 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> I hadn't really looked at the timeline and affected containers until Ian
> noticed the problem, but my impression right now is that 3.0 is probably
> the one to target anyway, to avoid supporting people using badly out of
> date containers.


Chiming in... I  think targeting servlet 3.0 would be fine.  I don't see
any hugely compelling reason to try and support 2.5, especially if it's
going to complicate moving to Spring 4, which I would see as desirable
given when we're expecting to ship 3.0.   By the time we ship, 3.0 will
have been out for 5 years-ish.  That does not seem like an unreasonable
requirement to me.




More information about the dev mailing list