Resources.

[Tom Zeller]

>>I did start with that, but it got a bit mind-melting when constructing
>>ShibbolethResourceHelper and doing the conversion of the tests.  But that
>>might just be a one-off pain and I'd not be opposed to putting it back.
>
> No big deal, just seems a bit weird. We don't have the word in our classes
> too often.

As before, concerning classes with the same name, I generally prefer
using package names to qualify rather than qualifying the class names
themselves.

Not a big deal with me either, but I prefer Resource over
ShibbolethResource, if you are asking.