Profile config strategy

[Cantor, Scott]

On 12/12/13, 3:18 PM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:

>>>If we add a property to fix a bug, then incrementing a minor version
>>>seems appropriate.
>>
>> If we think so, then I think it's really moot. It's formally an API
>>change
>> regardless.
>
>Obviously that was my assumption, but I am now understanding the
>excessiveness of "must" (bump the minor version). Seems like a topic
>for tomorrow.

Sure. I guess my original reason for asking was to find out if anybody has
a visceral "you're bad and you should feel bad" reaction to using
reflection / beans to get at the settings. I don't really care to
reproduce the whole mechanism I built in C++, so it's really reflection or
just stick with static classes.

-- Scott