Activation Criteria for Attribute resolvers

[Cantor, Scott]

On 8/15/13 10:35 AM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:

> > I think we probably want an interface, a Scripted implementation of it,
>> and that's about it.
>
>I'm really not in a hurry to be doing this.  My suggestion is that we
>
>- Move the tristate enum somewhere more general than Attribute Filter
>- Change the activation crtiterion to be a
>     Function<AttributeRecipientContext, Trisate> and define the interface
>     Around that
>- Config it by adding a 'criterion="SpringBeanRef"' attribute
>- Build the scripted implementation

Based on the limited understanding that I have, that sounds about right to
me.

One Q: does the AttributeRecipientContext include access to the data
that's been resolved up to that point?

-- Scott