Changes to web flow action proposal

[Cantor, Scott]

On 4/19/13 10:23 AM, "Marvin S. Addison" <marvin.addison at gmail.com> wrote:

>If I understand your concern correctly, the block above satisfies your
>concern. An exception raised in doExecute is not caught by the catch in
>the finally block. I took a moment to reassure myself with a simple test
>[1] that produces the following output:

No, my concern is one raised by doPostExecute. That one would be caught
and ignored.

Again, that's not supposed to happen, but if it does, I don't believe it
should be suppressed, not this far down anyway.

(Logging is a separate matter, we have to decide where that should happen,
and how exceptions relate to Events, which is still TBD, but that would
happen above this code.)

-- Scott