Changes to web flow action proposal

[Cantor, Scott]

On 4/18/13 10:10 AM, "Marvin S. Addison" <marvin.addison at gmail.com> wrote:

>That puts an awful lot of discipline on implementers of doPostExecute to
>catch all exceptions. Without strict adherence, an exception raised by
>doExecute would be dropped and replaced with that emanating from
>doPostExecute. I have used a library with plugins using the pattern
>above and have cursed the lack of additional error handling in the
>finally block. I hope you'll consider a try/catch block that wraps
>doPostExecute if you go with this design.

I don't have any problem with that.

-- Scott