On 4/1/13 12:10 PM, "Christopher Bongaarts" <cab at umn.edu> wrote: >IMHO, if the release of 2.4 is imminent (as it was last I had heard...), >might as well keep them, and ditch them at 3.0. It is, but part of the purpose of 2.4 is to flush issues in third party libraries so we know what we're dealing with in advance. -- Scott