OpenSAML Extensions

Tue Mar 27 11:50:25 BST 2012

Hi everyone,

I have a question regarding the < org.opensaml.saml2.core.Extensions > class. Is there a reason why it's structure doesn't follow the other elements? Specifically why there's a field < LOCAL_NAME : String > instead of a < DEFAULT_LOCAL_NAME : String > and no < DEFAULT_ELEMENT_NAME : QName > ? These fields are useful for using reflection to build the various SAML elements :)

Also the Extensions builder uses on it's no arg constructor the metadata namespace (SAML20MD_NS), shouldn't it be the protocol namespace (SAML20P_NS) the default?

Cheers,
Pedro Santos

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20120327/4ccd3313/attachment.html 