Asynch SLO Work

[Chad La Joie]

No, there is already a protocol for full global logout.  There is no
reason to re-invent the wheel.

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Chris Phillips
<Chris.Phillips at canarie.ca> wrote:
> Glad to see some activity on the SLO front...
>
> Will any of this new work use SAML change notify?  For instance, upon logout on the idp, issue the respective 'logout' via SAML change notify to the SPs.
>
> C
>
>
> /mobile_____________________
> chris.phillips at canarie.ca
>
> On Jul 6, 2012, at 10:33 AM, "Chad La Joie" <lajoie at itumi.biz> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Steven Carmody <Steven_Carmody at brown.edu> wrote:
>>> Will an SP have to know whether to send the protocol extension or the
>>> original protocol to a specific IDP? Presumably based on the IDPs
>>> metadata ?
>>
>> Yes, the SP will have to understand the extension and use it.  How it
>> does that for the Shib SP will be up to Scott (I would guess it would
>> just be enabled by default).
>>
>> --
>> Chad La Joie
>> www.itumi.biz
>> trusted identities, delivered
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net



-- 
Chad La Joie
www.itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered