Which way is better to create a saml object?

[Yaowen Tu]

I see this wiki: https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/OpenSAML/OSTwoUsrManJavaCreateFromScratch

I am wondering why the second way is not preferred. Seems that wiki is not explaining why. Or I missed anything?

Thanks,
Yaowen

On Aug 3, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Chad La Joie wrote:

> Please refer to the OpenSAML documentation.  It covers this.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Yaowen Tu <yaowen.tu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I am looking at some examples, and seeing two different ways of creating
>> SAML object. I want to know which is better?
>> 
>> One:
>> 
>> XMLObjectBuilderFactory builderFactory =
>> org.opensaml.Configuration.getBuilderFactory();
>> AuthnRequestBuilder arb = (AuthnRequestBuilder) builderFactory.getBuilder(
>> AuthnRequest.DEFAULT_ELEMENT_NAME );
>> AuthnRequest auth = (AuthnRequest) arb.buildObject();
>> 
>> 
>> Another:
>> 
>> AuthnRequest arb = (new AuthnRequestBuilder()).buildObject();
>> 
>> One is using factory to get the builder, and the other is just create a new
>> builder. I am not sure about the implementation. So I want to know which is
>> better?
>> 
>> Is the first one faster? Do we recommend using the second one?
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Yaowen
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>> dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chad La Joie
> www.itumi.biz
> trusted identities, delivered
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20120803/1e0395ca/attachment.html