consistentAddress, IPv6 and Happy Eyeballs

[Cantor, Scott]

On 4/24/12 3:40 AM, "Lukas Hämmerle" <lukas.haemmerle at switch.ch> wrote:
>
>All of the above solutions have their limitations and drawbacks.
>Another possible solution could be to extend the SP to remember one IPv4
>and one IPv6 address per client. This may mitigate the issue described
>above. One drawback here could be that this may degrade the security of
>the extended consistentAddress feature as an attacker probably could
>misuse it. So we are wondering what developers think of this?

But how would the SP know what they were? You mean have it auto-accept the
next address type of the other form it saw?

-- Scott