infinispan usage

[Paul Hethmon]

Russ,

I've given up on Terracotta, just been bitten one too many times. It's a
great concept, I even took the time and money to take one of their
classes. I just don't think it's going to work out in my situation. I
think Infinispan will give a smaller resource footprint and an easier to
debug/understand situation.

thx,

Paul


On 9/7/11 2:56 PM, "Russell Beall" <beall at usc.edu> wrote:

>Hi Paul,
>
>If you are still hunting for a more immediate solution, for your servers
>that are still using Terracotta, I highly recommend upgrading the
>EventingMapBasedStorageService object to use:
>org.terracotta.collections.ConcurrentDistributedMap
>
>instead of the ConcurrentHashMap.
>
>I have released this to production and it is performing beautifully.
>
>In testing this had better garbage collection performance for sure,
>however, I will add that I don't entirely believe it will handle your
>spurious two-minute garbage collection issues (even on small heaps).
>
>If you like, I can send you the very simple patch info.  The patch can be
>used with unclustered nodes as well since that object simply defaults
>back to the ConcurrentHashMap object in an unclustered environment.
>
>Regards,
>Russ.
>
>
>On Sep 7, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Paul Hethmon wrote:
>
>> cluster. I'm running about 60 or 70 Shib clusters right now. Not all of
>> them are configured for session support and hence need clustering, but
>> enough of them. So I should be able to get away with only having to
>>change
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net